https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
--- Comment #15 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> 2009-09-09 18:00:36 BST ---
As suggested in comment 11 I am going to resolve this as WONTFIX.
My reasons are:
- any change to use T-E is as likely or more likely to cause breakage
- patchy browser support means another handful of options would be required to
give sys admins a reasonable chance of configuring a working configuration
compatible with users and their combination of proxies and/or caches
- I believe the complexity this would add to the critical path isn't worth the
benefit
In my view the tipping point will be when IE supports T-E whether or not it
advertises support for it. At that point I would be all for switching to the
spec compliant way of doing compression.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
