Rainer Frey (Inxmail GmbH) wrote: > On Friday 07 August 2009 15:49:38 Mark Thomas wrote: >> Rainer Frey wrote: >>> 1. Revision 751496 was commented with "Tomcat uses Platform MBean server. >>> Adjust listener accordingly." and removed the separate configuration >>> for "Catalina" mbean server and registry. Was this accompanied by a >>> change in tomcat itself, and if so, with which released tomcat version >>> does the current revision work? Or should I use an older revision with >>> released tomcat 6? >> You can either use an older version or patch Tomcat 6. >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?diff_format=h&view=rev&revision=677910 > > Thanks for the info, and the amzingly quick answer. Are there plans to add at > least this patch to tomcat 6? I will bundle the JmxListener with an > application that comes with a tomcat inside, and would prefer to use a binary > build for that. > >>> 2. Are there plans to add this listener to Tomcat 6 release? >> Not at present. > > Was it denied, or never proposed? I remember from messages on the user > mailing > list you originally wanted to get this ready for 6.0.19.
I never proposed it. I'll propose that and the Platform MBean simplification for 6.0.x later today. >>> 3. I think of trying to backport this to Tomcat 5.0 for our internal use. >>> Do you think this is possible/feasible without knowledge of tomcat code >>> level internals? What was the situation regarding the mbean servers then? >> It should be reasonably portable. The listener doesn't touch any Tomcat >> internals apart from the listener interface, the string manager and the >> logger. Fixing any issues should be simple. Worst case - delete the >> references. > > Again, I sould base it on the revision with the additional catalina mbean > server, right? Yes, unless you patch Tomcat. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
