I'll open an incident ticket at IBM, hope they fix that miss. 2009/8/5 Henri Gomez <henri.go...@gmail.com>: >>> Why did we use unixd_set_global_mutex_perms/ap_unixd_set_global_mutex_perms >>> since both call didn't exist in i5/OS V6R1 and I had to set >>> JK_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS to 0 to have them excluded. >> >> Because otherwise, root created file locking objects are inaccessible to the >> child process running in a restricted security context. >> >> Clear enough? >> >> Perhaps the httpd/apr port is whacked. > > Very possibile since the AP_NEED_SET_MUTEX_PERMS is set to 1 but I > couldn't find ap_unixd_set_global_mutex_perms in the various include. > > And since IBM didn't profide support anymore for Apache 'modules' > developpers, I think it will be not be easy to get a reply about the > APR 1.2 port on i5/OS. >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
