William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
If there's a desire to move ahead with a new connector at the tomcat project, and the branch/release approach is planned to yield stable code that will improve from release to release, why even retain the association to 'jk'? It seems it would benefit the effort if stable code was released with a new module name that could grow to become trustworthy in user's/adopter's minds.
Why would you wish to change the name? Even today we occasionally have a question about mod_jk2 :) so this would only make things more confusing. We don't wish to drop the mod_jk, only put it inside maintenance mode with few pending things to finish like Rainer explained. Regards -- ^(TM) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
