https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46808
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> 2009-03-06 00:13:55 PST --- So having the "new" busy in shm is on purpose, and we have three of those: a) one for the lb in total b) one for each lb sub c) one for each ajp worker b) and c) are very likely, but not the same, e.g. when the ajp worker is used in more than one lb, or is used in an lb and also as a direct worker. But from your explanation I would think, that using the c) busy would be even better than using the b) busy? -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
