On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 14:50 -0800, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >> hi, >> >> looking at the tomcat comet module [1] and comparing it to the one in >> jetty/dojo [2], >> I wonder if the package (api-part) in tomcat shouldn't be named >> "org.cometd" (-> [3]). >> >> Another question is, is the tomcat module up-to-date? Since I see some diffs >> on >> the classes etc? (-> API) >> >> Are there some thoughts of a more common module for this? Like working >> on the API >> with Jetty/dojo and just *reuse* the API, here in Tomcat and just care >> about the actual >> IMPL ? > > This has been discussed one month ago. To summarize, this stuff is not a > standard, so something in the org.apache namespace was used.
oh, I see. Thanks So, I think I have one more question, on the completeness. What are the current plan? "Only" all the MUST/SHALL NOTs ? Or also optional, e.g streaming (as transport), to just name one -Matthias > > BTW, this Tomcat cometd API is also available in JBoss AS 5, so that > should mean good production deployment availability (eventually). > > Rémy > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
