Shanbo Li wrote: > > obviously *it missed the id field*. it would be much better that each table > have an id field. and make the table looks like this:
Obviously *this was done for a good reason*. The how to is intended for any database. The changes you propose are non-standard and hence will not work in many databases. Users are free to organise their data in any way they wish. The only constraint is how that data is presented to the JDBC realm. Many databases support the concept of views which can be used for this purpose. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
