jean-frederic clere wrote: > Hi, > > After fixing PR43327 I have made different related tests. > Actual using "::" will bind on IPv6 and Ipv4 addresses does it make > sense to have the following: > address="" (NULL) : bind on all addresses (IPv6 and IPv4). > address="0.0.0.0" : bind on all IPv4 addresses. > address="::" : bind all IPv6 addresses. > > Any comments?
Seems reasonable. >From what I recall, the root cause of 43327 was a mismatch in constants between the Java code and the C code. Does this really fix 43327 in the case where *only* IPv6 is present on the machine? I'll try and find some time to repeat my tests later this week with your fix. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
