Filip, this is a fairly rare case where I disagree with you ;) On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 7:18 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > simply because it requires changes, I like to think we work according to
It can be done without requiring any changes. > "if it aint broke, don't fix it", and since the maven build doesn't give us > anything the ANT build already does, then there seems to be little point of It's easier. That's it. > I suggest you go back in the archives, the comments you'll see this time > around, will be the same when this issue was brought up last and was voted Not true. I, for one, spoke against it in the past. Having used Maven 2 for 2+ years, I now prefer it over Ant. Moreover, I can testify that it's saved me and my teams considerable time and resulted in more consistent and cleaner builds. I haven't even bothered to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED], much less [EMAIL PROTECTED], I've just been a pure user and it's been cool. But like I said earlier, it's not worth disrupting the current Tomcat build or source layout. Only if it can be done without requiring any changes, which it can. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
