Henri Gomez wrote:
I do some search today and debugged TC 6.0.x trunk from my eclipse.
Authentification works great and the only remaining problem it so
setup roles in AD for users.

I used :

    <Realm   className="org.apache.catalina.realm.JNDIRealm"
         connectionURL="ldap://ldap.mycorp.com:389";
         alternateURL="ldap://ldap.mycorp.com:389";
         connectionName="cn=someldapaccounttobind,ou=MyCorp
Users,dc=mycorp,dc=com"
         connectionPassword="someldapaccounttobindpassword"
           userBase="ou=MyCorp Users,dc=mycorp,dc=com"
           userSearch="(sAMAccountName={0})"
           userSubtree="true"
           referrals="follow"
           userRoleName="memberOf"
           debug="true"
           />
Yes, this use case will work with the current Tomcat 6.0.X JNDIRealm code because your Active Directory administrator has given you search credentials for the Active Directory server (cn=someldapaccounttobind,ou=MyCorpUsers,dc=mycorp,dc=com/someldapaccounttobindpassword). But not all Active Directory administrators are willing to give out a set of credentials like this (for instance, a strict, enterprise environment where password access is strictly controlled).

My patch removes that requirement from the JNDIRealm. Instead of relying on a hard-coded value for authentication, it can fall back to using the credentials being supplied to the authenticate() call to perform the JNDI search (which will succeed because users have permissions to view their own LDAP object instance, as far as I know this is always true). The password is never stored; it is only transmitted at login time to the server (and this transmission can be protected from interception with LDAP over SSL).

It's a pretty minor change, written similarly to the way that the current JNDIRealm code retries during connection timeouts.

Seth Leger
Sr. Software Engineer
Raritan, Inc.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to