https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44517
--- Comment #2 from Darryl Miles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-03-08 19:39:17 PST --- What I'm questioning is that I don't think a court of law would consider Apache Tomcat's shipped XSD to be "derived" from specification, when its clear from a 'diff' that letter for letter, order for order what is shipped is the original SUN (minus their Copyright notice) which is blatant plagiarism and what Copyright law seeks to protect. I guess the Apache legal team either does not know about this specific case of this or is happy to take the risk (I myself doubt Sun would put up any fight but its the removal of their Copyright notice that beef's me off). Maybe Sun and the JSR/JCP system should have an independent entity for holding all IP and Copyright on such things to allow for simple copying into projects such as Apache Tomcat. Also when you say derived from the specification can you confirm exactly which specification and JSR erratum includes a textual description (that is not itself described/explained in the form of the Sun copyrighted XSD/DTD) that updates the mime-type regex. i.e. which JSR erratum did you respond to when updating the XSD ? Thanks for confirming 6.0.16 has been refreshed. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
