I'm fine with either approach as well. Larry
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Yoav Shapira > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 8:10 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Announce 3.x is no longer supported > > On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Well, the way Apache is structured, it is impossible to say that 3.x > is no > > longer supported. If three PMC members were to show an interest in > > expanding it in the future (say myself, Costin, Henri), then the > rest would > > have a hard time blocking commits to that branch ;). I would go for > > something like "The 3.x.x line is unlikely to have another release", > instead > > of "not supported" as a result. Especially since I plan to answer > the > > occational 3.3 question on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I would have no problem with this approach either. +1 to that as well > ;) Slightly gentler warning. > > Yoav > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
