DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43925>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43925 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-10 18:20 ------- Ok, so I not sure I got everything, but: - I don't see where memory usage is bounded in the code (if it's not, you should compare performance with the unbounded mode of Jasper, which will never reallocate anything); that's a problem - The opportunity is the ability to share the buffer list per thread, so the CharBuffer.bufList should be ThreadLocal<LinkedList> (and should be limited in size, which should solve item 1); as a configuration option, it could be a concurrent static structure, for use with thread intensive connectors - CharBuffer.toArray is expensive (no other option, though), so you should try to show a (real) test result -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
