DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44349 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-04 05:08 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > I tested Apache/2.0.52 with mod_jk/1.2.22 and it picked up the property > > setting > > correctly. > > Please ignore this last comment as I had checked the behaviour only and not > the > JK Status console with mod_jk/1.2.22. It still behaves incorrectly in that it > has sticky_session_force=True but when one of the servers is down with a > session > already established it loadbalances to the other server causing errors in our > application because we do not have the original session. Please note that we > do > not require session replication switched on. I have just checked the JK Status Console for mod_jk/1.2.22 and low and behold it does not show the sticky_session_force property as True even though it has been configured. Has this ever worked? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
