:)
what I meant was, it still contains non functional changes, such as reordering of imports, breaking up code lines etc. If I read the patch correctly, the only functional changes are really only during readPrincipal and writePrincipal, yet so many other lines are changed.

does that make sense, ie, the patch is fine, and works, and will get my +1, but it will make it hard for anyone else trying to review whether to functionality is compatible, still has to review 70% of lines that do nothing

Filip


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Thu Jan  3 14:54:47 2008
New Revision: 608666

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=608666&view=rev
Log:
Address Filip's concerns with a new patch.

Modified:
    tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt

Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
URL: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt?rev=608666&r1=608665&r2=608666&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt (original)
+++ tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt Thu Jan  3 14:54:47 2008
@@ -50,10 +50,9 @@
* Fix http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43840
   Include user principal if possible when serializing / de-serializing
-  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607596&view=rev
-  http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=607597&view=rev
-  +1: markt, funkman
-  -1: fhanik - lets not do e.printStackTrace, handle the error and log it 
correctly, also, have the diff only change lines that are actually changed. 
makes it easier to review
+  http://people.apache.org/~markt/dev/bug43840.txt
+  +1: markt
+  -1:
* Improve Jasper docs. Note rather than remove unused option, it will be
   deprecated in 6.0.x.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to