DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43873>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43873 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-20 09:34 ------- Thanks for reporting. The leak has been fixed in r596746 (in a slightly different way, because I don't want to expose the internals of timestamp formatting to the web server). Mladens comments about the complicated size handling led to another revision r596747. Even without r596747 there was no buffer overflow issue, because the longer string was truncated with '\0' before it was used in the shorter context. The changes will be part of version 1.2.26, which we expect to release soon. There will be a testing tarball before, with an announcement via the dev list. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
