DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41939>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41939 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-11-02 13:27 ------- I'm wary of the implications of the comments in this bug. Let me summarize to make sure we're all on the same level. I'm coming from bug 40212, btw. - To get per-app logging, one has to use the setup of comment #16 (one instance of log4j and commons-logging per tomcat and per webapp). - If you do this, you can get NPEs at the next startup because Tomcat clears static fields during undeploy. Can you explain to me how it can be possible that the instance N+1 of my webapp can see anything from instance N? If that would happen, it would either mean a) that tomcat is handing me classes which are in the common classpath despite them being overridden in my webapp b) that I get references to classes which ought no to exist anymore a) means that classes from tomcat leak into my webapp and b) means that classes from instance N can leak into N+1. Neither must be possible. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
