DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUGĀ·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED ANDĀ·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43687





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-10-30 02:28 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> From my reading of RFC 2616, this should work, since FF won't attempt to
> revalidate a page that it doesn't have in it's cache.  If it doesn't work, 
> than
> I consider it an FF bug (since the login page isn't in it's cache from 2616).

IMHO acording to RFC2616 (14.9.2) "Cache-control: no-store" header not clearly
forbids caching response in VOLATILE storage such as memory.

My understanding RFC2616 is following: to make response uncachable one should
send "Cache-control: no-cache" and NOT send headers used for revalidation such
"Etag" and "Last-Modified".

But the problem is IMHO in save/restore mechanism.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to