Hi Rainer,
I think we need a clear policy for all tomcat parts. Currently this
means that we
must also change the commit policy for jk and tcnative.
Peter
Am 01.10.2007 um 15:46 schrieb Rainer Jung:
Hi,
since the main project agreed on trying a new policy for commits
against stable branches, I think we should clarify our policy
concerning the native parts of Tomcat connectors (JK and tcnative).
Both have only one active branch, which at the moment is the stable
branch as well as the development branch.
The primary purpose of the commit policy is helping to interact the
comitters in a way, that provides a good balance between innovation
and stability. The group of committers for the two native projects
has a different structure than the main Tomcat project.
I think that until now we didn't have any incidents that indicate,
that we should switch to a new policy for the native projects. It's
possible, that this will be necessary, once development for JK3
really starts, in order to concentrate our efforts on the new branch.
I would like to gather opinions from the group concerning the
momentary situation:
- do you also think we can stick to CTR for
- JK native?
- tcnative?
I don't expect a lot of change for JK 1.2 (new features) and I
think we'll switch over to JK3 for all major new features. But
since we didn't have a problem with CTR on JK 1.2, I would prefer
sticking to that (for simplicity).
Regards,
Rainer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
