Remy Maucherat wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
Next attempt.
Taking account of the comments so far, a slightly modified proposal is
below.
svn cp https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/trunk
svn cp
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/tags/TOMCAT_6_0_14
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.1.0/trunk
Instead, I would propose to tag a new 6.0.15 candidate first.
That is also what I proposed in my previous comment.
Didn't see it, sorry. I propose tagging a 6.0.15 candidate on Monday.
Can we wait a bit, there are a few bug fixes that need to be caught up
on , and I also think we can improve upon the server.xml invalid
attribute implementation, the way I did the sandbox. I'll come up withe
patches for the bug and the fixes for the invalid attribute thingy, and
put them in the status file
Filip
Rémy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
