Not sure where is the dependency between sorting out the Comet strategy and implementing any new protocol or any new connector.
I think if there is interest - it can and should be pursued, would be a good start to see if the 'scratch your itches, but not in the core distro' works out :-). It would require some renaming the packages and small changes in the sandbox, moving them to trunk ( excluded from default ant build ) as well as building a connector-only mini-distro ( can be just a jar + html instructions to install/enable ). My understanding of the whole debate we recently had is that pursuing ideas and itches is allowed and encouraged - as long as it is outside the official tomcat release and doesn't require API or major changes. Costin On 9/27/07, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > until we sorted out our Comet implementation strategy, there is no point > pursuing this > > Filip > > Gurkan Erdogdu wrote: > > Hi guys; > > > > Is there any support for the Bayeux protocol and Comet style application > works in the Tomcat 6.x? I looked at the tomcat sandbox and that is this > implementations still experimental? Is there any timeline that these > components inclueded with tomcat distribution? > > > > Thanks; > > > > Gurkan > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Building a website is a piece of cake. Yahoo! Small Business gives you > all the tools to get online. > > http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/webhosting > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1027 - Release Date: > 9/24/2007 11:27 AM > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
