Costin Manolache wrote: > > Well, regarding the veto - it's simple. I second Remy's opinion that the > veto is valid > and the change is not right at the moment, and I guess that should close > this discussion. > > The discussion about whether to add such a feature or not - I think a simple > vote > would solve this as well, it's quite a subjective and taste-based issue. > There are many > other features that serve a small number of users only, the usual question > was > if enough tomcat developers are willing to support and want the feature. >
Just to be clear; Is the veto against the actual patch or the feature? If for the actual patch, then maybe you and Remy could provide feedback to Tim on what would make it acceptable... If for the actual feature, then I'm not sure how to jive that with your 2nd statement about a simple vote... Thanks! -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball." --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
