Hey, On 9/10/07, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about: > > o CTR on trunk > > o Various release branches are made (ala httpd, apr, etc...). > These include a STATUS file. > > o All code applied to the release branch is under > lazy consensus but *must* be specified in STATUS. > (eg: "I plan on applying rev786987 in 3 days under > lazy consensus"). > > Not as stringent as RTC, but also provides a good level > of oversight with a minimum of overhead... RTC can be > maintained for older, stable releases.
+1, fine by me. As long as trunk is CTR, i.e. I can work fast on the next release, it's fine by me. Yoav --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
