"Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > Due to continuing independent development in trunk by Filip, I am calling > for a second vote to move it to the sandbox, where Filip could continue > developing his ideas in a non disruptive way. I think the whole thing has > been debated pretty extensively in the previous vote. > > Following this, debate should take place to determine if a new main trunk > is needed, and if commit procedure changes would be good (personally, I do > like Jean-Frédéric's ideas). > > <ballot> > [X] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 > </ballot> >
I agree that the competing Comet implementations should have their own sandbox entries for now, and allow code-Darwanism determine the one for 6.next or 7.0 (whichever comes first). At the moment it is clear that the current trunk (aka Filip's sandbox) can't be released due to lack of community support, so there is no reason to call it "trunk". I'd be infavor of having a "trunk" that contains the Geronimo injection changes, but as Remy said that is a separate [VOTE]. (And for the httpd lurkers on the list, yes, we used to be a Jakarta project, so we are still very vote-happy :). > Rémy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
