Remy Maucherat wrote:
Tim Funk wrote:
I thought changes were going into trunk and then when applicable,
backported to 6.0.x.
While I initiated the creation of the trunk branch, I can no longer
work with Filip since I disagree with him on API design, and I don't
like his ideas on collaboration. As a result, I do not wish to
participate in trunk development, and I have to do my development
activities elsewhere :(
it's community development, you can participate or not. That's your call.
You've threatened to start other branches elsewhere, you've threatened
to leave, you can keep threatening, if the community is strong enough it
will survive. If it is not, then it will fall, just like Rome did.
I now think removing the trunk branch or moving it to the sandbox
would be best.
I'm gonna propose for trunk to stay, we specifically made that cause you
decided changes the Geronimo team needed were not appropriate.
And there are other changes that have gone in there since then.
Since this change is only writing warning messages. It seems
appropriate that it can remain in 6.0.x.
Yes, it should only display warnings, but if we display bad warnings
in a stable release, we'll get zillions of angry users.
right up your ally ;)
So it's important to get it right. I committed this in the 6.0.x
branch since I don't have any other sensible place to commit it.
it not backwards compatible, that's why 6.0 would be inappropriate for
such a change
Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
