This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 54b3d520e3 Prepare for automated formatting
54b3d520e3 is described below
commit 54b3d520e3739523aef33facc4ee108b7077621c
Author: Mark Thomas <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Fri Aug 29 12:20:08 2025 +0100
Prepare for automated formatting
---
java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java | 2 +-
java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/CookiesWithoutEquals.java | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
b/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
index 47de5cf089..f427265ac1 100644
--- a/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
+++ b/java/org/apache/jasper/compiler/Generator.java
@@ -3275,7 +3275,7 @@ class Generator {
/**
* Determines whether a tag should be handled via nonstandard code
(typically
* faster). Considers both configuration and level of support within
Tomcat.
- *
+ * <p>
* Note that Tomcat is free to ignore any case it cannot handle, as
long as it
* reports it accurately to the caller by returning false. For
example, the
* initial implementation for c:set excludes support for body content.
c:set
diff --git a/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/CookiesWithoutEquals.java
b/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/CookiesWithoutEquals.java
index 5cb86949bb..4eefb7f4b1 100644
--- a/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/CookiesWithoutEquals.java
+++ b/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/http/CookiesWithoutEquals.java
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ public enum CookiesWithoutEquals {
IGNORE("ignore"),
NAME("name");
/*
+ * @formatter:off
* There is no VALUE option since the Servlet specification does not
permit the creation of a Cookie with a name
* that is either null or the zero length string.
*
@@ -55,9 +56,9 @@ public enum CookiesWithoutEquals {
* For the user agent:
* - a name-value-pair without an equals sign is treated as the value of
a cookie with an empty name.
* - both empty name and empty value are allowed but if both are empty
the cookie will be ignored.
+ * @formatter:on
*
- * To see how RFC6265 arrived at his behaviour, see:
- * https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/159
+ * To see how RFC6265 arrived at his behaviour, see
https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/issues/159
*
* Historically, the users agents settled on using a name-value-pair
without an equals sign to indicate a cookie
* with a value but no name. Tomcat did the opposite. That arose from
addressing this bug:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
