Dimitris,

On 3/3/25 9:57 AM, Dimitris Soumis wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 8:29 AM Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:

The proposed Apache Tomcat 10.1.37 release is now available for
voting.

All committers and PMC members are kindly requested to provide a vote if
possible. ANY TOMCAT USER MAY VOTE, though only PMC members votes are
binding. We welcome non-committer votes or comments on release builds.

The notable changes compared to 10.1.36 are:

- Improve the checks for exposure to and protection against
    CVE-2024-56337 so that reflection is not used unless required. The
    checks for whether the file system is case sensitive or not have been
    removed.

- Use Transfer-Encoding for compression rather than Content-Encoding if
    the client submits a TE header containing gzip

- Add makensis as an option for building the Installer for Windows on
    non-Windows platforms.

For full details, see the change log:
https://nightlies.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-10.1.x/docs/changelog.html

Applications that run on Tomcat 9 and earlier will not run on Tomcat 10
without changes. Java EE applications designed for Tomcat 9 and earlier
may be placed in the $CATALINA_BASE/webapps-javaee directory and Tomcat
will automatically convert them to Jakarta EE and copy them to the
webapps directory.

It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-10/v10.1.37/

The Maven staging repo is:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-1535

The tag is:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/10.1.37

https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/e4338ee7a3e0f22d85f7cb2e04dacee752eaa619

Please reply with a +1 for release or +0/-0/-1 with an explanation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org


+1 Build is reproducible and all tests pass on Fedora 41 with Java 21,
tcnative-2.0.8, apr-1.7.4, openssl-3.2.4.

However, the RSA key (3262A061C42FC4C7BBB5C25C1CF0293FA53CA458) used to
sign the release is still not present in the KEYS file.

This is what I get during validation of e.g. the .exe artifact:

$ gpg --verify --keyring ./apache-keys --no-default-keyring apache-tomcat-10.1.37.exe.asc apache-tomcat-10.1.37.exe
gpg: Signature made Sat Mar  1 01:00:52 2025 EST
gpg:                using RSA key 3262A061C42FC4C7BBB5C25C1CF0293FA53CA458
gpg: Good signature from "Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net>" [ultimate] gpg: aka "Christopher Schultz <cschu...@chadis.com>" [ultimate] gpg: aka "Christopher Schultz <schu...@apache.org>" [ultimate] gpg: aka "Christopher Schultz <christopher.schu...@alumni.rose-hulman.edu>" [ultimate]
$ echo $?
0

The apache-keys file is a proper GPG keyring imported using this command:

$ gpg --import --no-default-keyring --primary-keyring ./apache-keys < KEYS

The key I use to sign is a subkey of my main key. I believe I've been using the same key to sign releases for a good long time.

But I do see that my signature on the Windows .exe binary is not quite right. It fails using osssigncodeusing my usual method :/

-chris


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to