https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69532
Remy Maucherat <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS| |All --- Comment #1 from Remy Maucherat <[email protected]> --- It looks like the pattern where usually a regular sync + a volatile field is used. The problem is the field here is inside a reference so not volatile (I suppose it's why Mark came up with that read lock). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
