Chenjp commented on PR #791: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/791#issuecomment-2516821173
> Yes. This change has been reverted. It is not RFC 9110 compliant. It is not rfc required, remove this detector if reasonable cases endorse. Rfc uses term MAY, not MUST: A server that supports range requests ***MAY*** ignore or reject a [Range](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#field.range) header field that contains an invalid [ranges-specifier](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#rule.ranges-specifier) ([Section 14.1.1](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#range.specifiers)), a [ranges-specifier](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#rule.ranges-specifier) with more than two overlapping ranges, or a set of many small ranges that are not listed in ascending order -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
