https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355

--- Comment #5 from Remy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> ---
(In reply to Chen Jp from comment #4)
> (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #3)
> > I see a trend in the PRs that you are submitting. Trying to be as precise as
> > possible is a commendable goal, but the problem is that this exactitude does
> > not make much sense in the context of Tomcat since the randomness of network
> > transport is always present. As a result, it can be better to be as
> > efficient as possible and accept deviating a few % off target.
> > 
> > Q: Are you using a tool to identify these issues ? Finding them by yourself
> > on your own would be very impressive.
> 
> If extra accuracy doesn't cost much, why not? It's useful for debugging
> purpose.
> 
> A new spec draft is published recently, on Oct 7. Please see
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers/
> 
> A: As a senior Javaer but not so familiar with tomcat source code(especially
> on tomcat-http11/http2-communication part), hope to contribute. First of
> all, I do think that using of code quality tool (+ AI.) is a basic skill for
> us. There is no reason not to fix the issues/bugs, no matter how they are
> identified (100% manually or 95% artificially). Secondary, if you have
> similar tool which can identify this BZ rate-limit-enhancement feather
> request, I'm very interesting in it, please share it with me.
> 
> per comment, replacement PR present.
> (https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/760)

Sure ok, 100% precision is better, so I am not against fixing it if there's no
downside. However, there's a lot of analysis needed to find this one, and the
benefit for the fix is minimal to non existent. So overall I am surprised you
did not find any other higher impact issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to