Author: funkman
Date: Fri Jun 1 04:28:14 2007
New Revision: 543460
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=543460
Log:
jk2 update and other legacy cleanup
Modified:
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/connectors.html
tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/printer/connectors.html
tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs-faq/connectors.xml
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/connectors.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/connectors.html?view=diff&rev=543460&r1=543459&r2=543460
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/connectors.html (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/connectors.html Fri Jun 1 04:28:14 2007
@@ -13,7 +13,11 @@
</p>
<p>
- <a href="http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/";>JK docs.</a>
+ Here is a link to the <a
href="http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/";>JK Connectors.</a> It contains
+ more configuration and installation information.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ <strong>Please note, jk2 is no longer supported. Please use mod_jk
instead.</strong>
</p>
</blockquote></td></tr></table><table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
border="0"><tr><td bgcolor="#525D76"><font face="arial,helvetica.sanserif"
color="#ffffff"><a
name="Questions"><strong>Questions</strong></a></font></td></tr><tr><td><blockquote>
<p>
@@ -38,14 +42,6 @@
At boot, is order of start up (Apache vs Tomcat) important?
</a>
</li>
- <li>
- <a href="#jkloc">
- JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my
- <code>workers2.properties</code> file
- such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat,
- what's wrong?
- </a>
- </li>
<li>
<a href="#generated">
@@ -111,12 +107,14 @@
The alternative is mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp.
</li>
<li>
- <b>mod_jk is great and should be used for production. It is getting
- fixes as needed (which is now rare). </b>
+ <strong>mod_jk is great and should be used for production. </strong>
+ It is still under active
+ development and also works for the apache 2.X series for cases where
+ you do not want to use mod_proxy_ajp.
</li>
<li>mod_proxy. A cheap way to proxy without the hassles of configuring
JK.
This solution lacks sticky session load balancing. If you don't
- need some of the features of jk, jk2 - this is a very simple
+ need some of the features of jk - this is a very simple
alternative.
</li>
<li>mod_proxy_ajp. With apache 2.2, mod_proxy was rewritten to support
@@ -137,7 +135,7 @@
reasons why it
should not be done too. Needless to say, everyone will disagree with
the opinions here.
- With the upcoming performance of Tomcat 5, performance reasons
+ With the performance of Tomcat 5 and 6, performance reasons
become harder to justify. So here are the issues to discuss in
integrating vs not.
<br><br>
@@ -202,11 +200,6 @@
packets, invalid requests from invalid IP's, Apache does a better job
at dropping these error conditions than JVM based program. (YMMV)
</li>
- <li>
- <a
href="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=104874913017036&w=2";>Here
</a>
- is a great response from Craig R. McClanahan. If you have free time,
- read emails by him in any of the list archives. You'll learn a lot.
- </li>
</ul>
</div><br>
@@ -221,30 +214,6 @@
</div><br>
<b style="font-size: larger">
- <a name="jkloc">
- JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my
- <code>workers2.properties</code> file
- such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat,
- what's wrong?
- </a>
- </b>
- <div style="padding-left : 20px;">
- JK2 is not finding your <code>workers2.properties</code> file.
- Specify it's location in your <code>httpd.conf</code> file by adding:
-
- <br><br>
- <code>
- JkSet config.file /full/system/path/to/workers2.properties
- </code>
- <br><br>
- <a href="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105784893200003&r=1&w=2";>
- Thread which spawned this question.
- </a> <br>
- <b>Please note the JK2 is unsupported.</b>
- </div><br>
-
-
- <b style="font-size: larger">
<a name="generated">
Is there any way to control the content of automatically generated
<code>mod_jk.conf-auto</code>? I need my own specific commands added
@@ -303,7 +272,7 @@
</a>
</b>
<div style="padding-left : 20px;">
- In tomcat 5 - does your connector have Connector declaration have
+ Since tomcat 5 - does your connector have Connector declaration have
<tt>URIEncoding="UTF-8"</tt>. For example:
<pre>
<Connector port="80"
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/printer/connectors.html
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/printer/connectors.html?view=diff&rev=543460&r1=543459&r2=543460
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/printer/connectors.html (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/docs/faq/printer/connectors.html Fri Jun 1 04:28:14 2007
@@ -12,7 +12,11 @@
</p>
<p>
- <a href="http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/";>JK docs.</a>
+ Here is a link to the <a
href="http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/";>JK Connectors.</a> It contains
+ more configuration and installation information.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ <strong>Please note, jk2 is no longer supported. Please use mod_jk
instead.</strong>
</p>
</blockquote></td></tr></table><table cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0"
border="0"><tr><td bgcolor="#525D76"><font face="arial,helvetica.sanserif"
color="#ffffff"><a
name="Questions"><strong>Questions</strong></a></font></td></tr><tr><td><blockquote>
<p>
@@ -37,14 +41,6 @@
At boot, is order of start up (Apache vs Tomcat) important?
</a>
</li>
- <li>
- <a href="#jkloc">
- JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my
- <code>workers2.properties</code> file
- such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat,
- what's wrong?
- </a>
- </li>
<li>
<a href="#generated">
@@ -110,12 +106,14 @@
The alternative is mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp.
</li>
<li>
- <b>mod_jk is great and should be used for production. It is getting
- fixes as needed (which is now rare). </b>
+ <strong>mod_jk is great and should be used for production. </strong>
+ It is still under active
+ development and also works for the apache 2.X series for cases where
+ you do not want to use mod_proxy_ajp.
</li>
<li>mod_proxy. A cheap way to proxy without the hassles of configuring
JK.
This solution lacks sticky session load balancing. If you don't
- need some of the features of jk, jk2 - this is a very simple
+ need some of the features of jk - this is a very simple
alternative.
</li>
<li>mod_proxy_ajp. With apache 2.2, mod_proxy was rewritten to support
@@ -136,7 +134,7 @@
reasons why it
should not be done too. Needless to say, everyone will disagree with
the opinions here.
- With the upcoming performance of Tomcat 5, performance reasons
+ With the performance of Tomcat 5 and 6, performance reasons
become harder to justify. So here are the issues to discuss in
integrating vs not.
<br><br>
@@ -201,11 +199,6 @@
packets, invalid requests from invalid IP's, Apache does a better job
at dropping these error conditions than JVM based program. (YMMV)
</li>
- <li>
- <a
href="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=104874913017036&w=2";>Here
</a>
- is a great response from Craig R. McClanahan. If you have free time,
- read emails by him in any of the list archives. You'll learn a lot.
- </li>
</ul>
</div><br>
@@ -220,30 +213,6 @@
</div><br>
<b style="font-size: larger">
- <a name="jkloc">
- JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my
- <code>workers2.properties</code> file
- such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat,
- what's wrong?
- </a>
- </b>
- <div style="padding-left : 20px;">
- JK2 is not finding your <code>workers2.properties</code> file.
- Specify it's location in your <code>httpd.conf</code> file by adding:
-
- <br><br>
- <code>
- JkSet config.file /full/system/path/to/workers2.properties
- </code>
- <br><br>
- <a href="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105784893200003&r=1&w=2";>
- Thread which spawned this question.
- </a> <br>
- <b>Please note the JK2 is unsupported.</b>
- </div><br>
-
-
- <b style="font-size: larger">
<a name="generated">
Is there any way to control the content of automatically generated
<code>mod_jk.conf-auto</code>? I need my own specific commands added
@@ -302,7 +271,7 @@
</a>
</b>
<div style="padding-left : 20px;">
- In tomcat 5 - does your connector have Connector declaration have
+ Since tomcat 5 - does your connector have Connector declaration have
<tt>URIEncoding="UTF-8"</tt>. For example:
<pre>
<Connector port="80"
Modified: tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs-faq/connectors.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs-faq/connectors.xml?view=diff&rev=543460&r1=543459&r2=543460
==============================================================================
--- tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs-faq/connectors.xml (original)
+++ tomcat/site/trunk/xdocs-faq/connectors.xml Fri Jun 1 04:28:14 2007
@@ -26,7 +26,11 @@
</p>
<p>
- <a href="http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/";>JK docs.</a>
+ Here is a link to the <a
href="http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/";>JK Connectors.</a> It contains
+ more configuration and installation information.
+ </p>
+ <p>
+ <strong>Please note, jk2 is no longer supported. Please use mod_jk
instead.</strong>
</p>
</section>
@@ -54,14 +58,6 @@
At boot, is order of start up (Apache vs Tomcat) important?
</a>
</li>
- <li>
- <a href="#jkloc">
- JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my
- <code>workers2.properties</code> file
- such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat,
- what's wrong?
- </a>
- </li>
<li>
<a href="#generated">
@@ -130,12 +126,14 @@
The alternative is mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp.
</li>
<li>
- <b>mod_jk is great and should be used for production. It is getting
- fixes as needed (which is now rare). </b>
+ <strong>mod_jk is great and should be used for production. </strong>
+ It is still under active
+ development and also works for the apache 2.X series for cases where
+ you do not want to use mod_proxy_ajp.
</li>
<li>mod_proxy. A cheap way to proxy without the hassles of configuring
JK.
This solution lacks sticky session load balancing. If you don't
- need some of the features of jk, jk2 - this is a very simple
+ need some of the features of jk - this is a very simple
alternative.
</li>
<li>mod_proxy_ajp. With apache 2.2, mod_proxy was rewritten to support
@@ -156,7 +154,7 @@
reasons why it
should not be done too. Needless to say, everyone will disagree with
the opinions here.
- With the upcoming performance of Tomcat 5, performance reasons
+ With the performance of Tomcat 5 and 6, performance reasons
become harder to justify. So here are the issues to discuss in
integrating vs not.
<br/><br/>
@@ -221,11 +219,6 @@
packets, invalid requests from invalid IP's, Apache does a better job
at dropping these error conditions than JVM based program. (YMMV)
</li>
- <li>
- <a
href="http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=104874913017036&w=2";>Here
</a>
- is a great response from Craig R. McClanahan. If you have free time,
- read emails by him in any of the list archives. You'll learn a lot.
- </li>
</ul>
</answer>
@@ -240,30 +233,6 @@
</answer>
<question>
- <a name="jkloc">
- JK2 doesn't seem to be using my settings in my
- <code>workers2.properties</code> file
- such as creating the shm file or mapping the URIs listed to Tomcat,
- what's wrong?
- </a>
- </question>
- <answer>
- JK2 is not finding your <code>workers2.properties</code> file.
- Specify it's location in your <code>httpd.conf</code> file by adding:
-
- <br /><br />
- <code>
- JkSet config.file /full/system/path/to/workers2.properties
- </code>
- <br /><br />
- <a href='http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=105784893200003&r=1&w=2'>
- Thread which spawned this question.
- </a> <br />
- <b>Please note the JK2 is unsupported.</b>
- </answer>
-
-
- <question>
<a name="generated">
Is there any way to control the content of automatically generated
<code>mod_jk.conf-auto</code>? I need my own specific commands added
@@ -322,7 +291,7 @@
</a>
</question>
<answer>
- In tomcat 5 - does your connector have Connector declaration have
+ Since tomcat 5 - does your connector have Connector declaration have
<tt>URIEncoding="UTF-8"</tt>. For example:
<pre>
<Connector port="80"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
