https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69333
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> --- I'm fairly sure that try/catch/finally don't add any overhead in terms of method-code-bytes. It expands the size of the exception-handling table, but it doesn't reduce code size. Perhaps overall .class file size, sure. Usually complaints about JSPs are due to a single method becoming too long to fit into the .class file format. In your case, you were concerned about code cache usage which, I think, will still be the same with or without the try/catch/finally blocks. I'm not saying there isn't a change worth making here; quite the contrary. Any simplification of any code is always a win IMHO. I just want to make sure to manage expectations of what any change will actually accomplish. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
