On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:22 PM Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: > > Rémy, > > On 8/2/24 19:02, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > The proposed Apache Tomcat 9.0.93 release is now available for voting. > > > > The notable changes compared to 9.0.91 are: > > > > - Align HTTP/2 with HTTP/1.1 and recycle the container internal request > > and response processing objects by default. This behaviour can be > > controlled via the new discardRequestsAndResponses attribute on the > > HTTP/2 upgrade protocol. > > > > - Add OpenSSL support for FFM. Using this feature requires Java 22 > > or newer. > > > > - Add support for RFC 8297 (Early Hints). Applications can use this > > feature by casting the HttpServletResponse to > > org.apache.catalina.connector.Reponse and then calling the method > > void sendEarlyHints() > > > > For full details, see the changelog: > > https://nightlies.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-9.0.x/docs/changelog.html > > > > It can be obtained from: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-9/v9.0.93/ > > > > The Maven staging repo is: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-1510 > > > > The tag is: > > https://github.com/apache/tomcat/tree/9.0.93 > > a33d708d9b078e0d7bc8abda91c8634c4f338d99 > > > > The proposed 9.0.93 release is: > > [ ] -1, Broken - do not release > > [ ] +1, Stable - go ahead and release as 9.0.93 > > +1 for stable release. > > Build is reproducible and the unit tests pass on MacOS x86-64. > > I still see a weird difference in the -fulldocs package that do not make > any sense to me: > > In the file list: > │ │ --rw-r--r-- 0 0 0 9426093 2024-08-02 > 21:24:59.000000 tomcat-9.0-doc/api/index-all.html > │ │ +-rw-r--r-- 0 0 0 9426102 2024-08-02 > 21:24:59.000000 tomcat-9.0-doc/api/index-all.html > > In the file index-all.html: > │ │ -<dt><a > href="org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/Jre22Compat.html#addBootModulePath(java.util.Deque)" > class="member-name-link">addBootModulePath(Deque<URL>)</a> - > Method in class org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.<a > href="org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/Jre22Compat.html" title="class in > org.apache.tomcat.util.compat">Jre22Compat</a></dt> > │ │ +<dt><a > href="org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/Jre19Compat.html#addBootModulePath(java.util.Deque)" > class="member-name-link">addBootModulePath(Deque<URL>)</a> - > Method in class org.apache.tomcat.util.compat.<a > href="org/apache/tomcat/util/compat/Jre19Compat.html" title="class in > org.apache.tomcat.util.compat">Jre19Compat</a></dt> > > The "left file" is the one I generated locally while the "right file" is > the release artifact. So my build uses Jre22Compat in this javadoc file > while yours references Jre19Compat. > > The file tomcat-9.0-doc/api/member-search-index.js has a similar > exchange of Jre22Compat for Jre19Compat.
Neither option seems particularly wrong to me here. > Note that I am using the same 17.0.12+7 compiler you are using plus Java > 22.0.2 for the FFM bits. The details below are for my fully-automated > tests which always use my latest JRE for everything. Only the main Java is used for javadoc. Rémy > I am seeing some unit tests skipped that I am not expecting to be > skipped. I wonder if my native components builds are working as expected. > > Details: > > * Environment > * Testing Apache Tomcat 9.0.93 > * Java (build): openjdk version "22.0.2" 2024-07-16 OpenJDK Runtime > Environment Temurin-22.0.2+9 (build 22.0.2+9) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM > Temurin-22.0.2+9 (build 22.0.2+9, mixed mode) > * Java (test): 22 ( openjdk version "22.0.2" 2024-07-16 > * OS: Darwin 23.5.0 x86_64 > * cc: Apple clang version 12.0.5 (clang-1205.0.22.9) > * make: GNU Make 3.81 > * OpenSSL: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 Jun 2024 (Library: OpenSSL 3.3.1 4 > Jun 2024) > * APR: 1.7.4 > * > * Valid SHA-512 signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.zip > * Valid GPG signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.zip > * Valid SHA-512 signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.tar.gz > * Valid GPG signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.tar.gz > * Valid SHA-512 signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.exe > * Valid GPG signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.exe > * Valid Windows Digital Signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93.exe > * Valid SHA512 signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93-src.zip > * Valid GPG signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93-src.zip > * Valid SHA512 signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93-src.tar.gz > * Valid GPG signature for apache-tomcat-9.0.93-src.tar.gz > * > * Binary Zip and tarball: Same > * Source Zip and tarball: Same > * > * Building dependencies returned: 0 > * tcnative builds cleanly > * Tomcat builds cleanly > * Junit Tests: PASSED > > -chris > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
