On 2024/07/04 13:15:26 Rémy Maucherat wrote: > Hi, > > As an experiment, I tested with LibreSSL and BoringSSL on LInux using > the FFM code. Both did not need too many API changes to start working, > so I committed the changes to "add support" for them. > > BoringSSL:
I wouldn't waste any time for BoringSSL: https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl > Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general > use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. > Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API > or ABI stability. >From my PoV only OpenSSL and LibreSSL make sense. Michael --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
