Hi all, Sounds very good overall but would be great to not do it at the cost to break tomcat IDE support maybe - current status since it uses a single module and not all IDE support to compile supackages with different target versions? Overall stays an Apache project where we should ensure we make contributions easy ;).
Indeed just my 2cts feedback. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le ven. 23 févr. 2024 à 16:08, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> a écrit : > On 23/02/2024 13:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to propose backporting the OpenSSL FFM support to Tomcat > 10.1. > > > > Java 22.0.0 should be released on March 19, and the next Java LTS > > should still have no problem targeting Java 11. As a result, there > > should be no negative impact to the platform support, and users > > running on Java 22+ could benefit from easier OpenSSL support. > > > > Obviously I anticipate most users will use FFM support once the next > > Java LTS is out in a few years, but getting the feature out now would > > still be good. > > > > After the change: > > - Compiling, running the testsuite, etc is still doable with Java 17. > > - Running Tomcat 10.1 still works with Java 11. > > - Building a Tomcat 10.1 release would now require Java 22+. > > > > Backporting further to Tomcat 9.0 could be riskier however. Following > > the removal of the Java 7 release target, Java 8 might be next. The > > main question is if the next Java LTS will still support the Java 8 > > release target. > > > > Comments ? > > LGTM. > > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
