In jklog_cleanup I could see :

static apr_status_t jklog_cleanup(void *d)
{
#ifdef AS400
   main_log = NULL;
#endif

   d = NULL;
   return APR_SUCCESS;
}

Shouldn't it be *d = NULL ?

Also shouldn't we reset main_log and conf->log ?


2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
It works ! great.

Could I commit ?

Also find a way to fix for i5/OS the HTTP 500 problem

2007/4/24, Henri Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You remove completly the apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, conf->log, 
jklog_cleanup,
> jklog_cleanup) ?
>
> 2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Great. I think I now understand the problem.
> >
> > Could you try this one relativ to your last change:
> >
> > Index: mod_jk.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- mod_jk.c    (revision 531926)
> > +++ mod_jk.c    (working copy)
> > @@ -2539,11 +2539,7 @@
> >
> >  static apr_status_t jklog_cleanup(void *d)
> >  {
> > -    /* set the main_log to NULL */
> > -#ifdef AS400
> > -       main_log = null;
> > -#endif
> > -
> > +    /* set the log to NULL */
> >      d = NULL;
> >      return APR_SUCCESS;
> >  }
> > @@ -2616,9 +2612,10 @@
> >          jkl->logger_private = flp;
> >          flp->jklogfp = conf->jklogfp;
> >          conf->log = jkl;
> > -        if (main_log == NULL)
> > +        if (main_log == NULL) {
> >              main_log = conf->log;
> > -        apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, conf->log, jklog_cleanup,
> > jklog_cleanup);
> > +            apr_pool_cleanup_register(p, main_log, jklog_cleanup,
> > jklog_cleanup);
> > +        }
> >          return 0;
> >      }
> >
> > The point is: when I added full virtual server support for all configs I
> > changed the cleanup function to NULL the virtual server logger. It
> > NULLed main_log before. But the only reason it should NULL a logger was
> > the check for NULL in
> >
> >         if (main_log == NULL)
> >             main_log = conf->log;
> >
> > So if main_log is set once, it never gets reset. This is bad, if the
> > pool from which it got acquired is dead. So we actually need to register
> > the log cleanup only for main_log, because otherwise main_log will
> > always reference an outdated logger. conf->log will be overwritten
> > during each init, no need to reset those.
> >
> > At least that's my theory for it. Could you test this patch?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rainer
> >
> >
> >
> > Henri Gomez schrieb:
> > > I made it works by adding main_log = NULL in jklog_cleanup
> > >
> > > static apr_status_t jklog_cleanup(void *d)
> > > {
> > >    /* set the main_log to NULL */
> > >    d = NULL;
> > >    main_log = NULL;
> > >    return APR_SUCCESS;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Don't forget that jk is initialized twice and on i5/OS in the same
> > > thread, so may be the static var should be reset.
> > >
> > > What do you think of the patch ?
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/4/24, Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >> main_log is a static in mod_jk.c, which is initialized as NULL.
> > >>
> > >> It gets set inside open_jklog() which gets called once for every virtual
> > >> server by jk_post_config() during server initialization.
> > >>
> > >> The first virtual server inherits its logger conf->log from its
> > >> configuration to main_log. It also registers a cleanup handler which
> > >> will NULL its conf->log, but that should not change main_log.
> > >>
> > >> main_log should never get reset.
> > >>
> > >> To find the problem, it would be best to first reduce the apache config
> > >> to not use any virtual servers.
> > >>
> > >> You can log the value of main_log for debug purposes anywhere in
> > >> mod_jk.c, because its a global static.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >>
> > >> Rainer
> > >>
> > >> Henri Gomez schrieb:
> > >> > I'm looking for the exception in jk_log. It happen in ws_write right
> > >> > now and I wonder what's the life cycle of main_log.
> > >> >
> > >> > On i5/OS, the init / post are done on the same thread (not the same on
> > >> > Unixes).
> > >> >
> > >> > How is reset the main_log ?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to