> 1. It is better to stay with a solution owned by ASF as much as possible. > For political reasons such as independence.
AFAIK, the ASF is incorporated in the USA, so the organization must follow the USA laws. Are you sure the ASF provides "political independence"? > GitHub is not the only git hosting service out there. To my best knowledge, the ASF supports only two git hosting services: a) GitBox (see https://git.apache.org/) b) GitHub (it any case it is mirrored to GitBox) GitBox does not support issue tracking, so would you please clarify what do you mean by "is not the only git hosting service out there"? To my best knowledge, GitHub is the only git service that integrates issue tracking and code hosting. At the same time, Tomcat hosts code at GitHub, and there's a significant number of PR contributions via GitHub: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pulls, so it looks reasonable to move issues closer to PRs and code. > 2. E-mails allowed to the mailing lists have to be plain text. Well, GitBox does produce text emails that look not much different from Bugzilla emails to me. Just in case, GitHub uses markdown for the format, so the emails in text form are readable. Here's a recent bug where comment already uses markdown, so the same thing would look better in GitHub UI: https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66191 "issue created" mail: https://lists.apache.org/thread/4q6vmr0qq7w3pomtx1qpyj2gy8f0576h "issue commented" mail: https://lists.apache.org/thread/rch13owttglnpq2gfg6xhz00kw73on71 Would you please check the above notifications and clarify why you think Bugzilla emails are better? Vladimir --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
