https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66035
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> --- (In reply to Remy Maucherat from comment #3) > JF seems to think simply return NULL; is enough (I agree this is not an > error). Aha, so simply return NULL instead of throwing an exception? > Also the second check may not be needed, on renegotiate there would be a > session I suppose. I just figured an extra check is better than a crash... just in case :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
