Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
I took the liberty and added the <Executor> element to server.xml
today.
It performs surprisingly well,
I don't see why it would perform worse than your internal connector
executor :)
I was comparing to the existing stack thread pool, :)
for example, the JioEndpoint performs much better with the executor than
the worker stack, surprisingly
Filip
I tried to make the default implementation as basic as possible.
Let me know if you have any feedback.
It looks good. I find the connector rule trick a bit weird, but it
works.
Yeah, I wasn't sure what you had in mind, since the executor is a
string in server.xml but has to reference an object inside the Service
object, and on top of that, it can't be a part of the
"setAllProperties" either.
Never really had a thing for the digester :)
Filip
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
