DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41828>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41828 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-03-17 03:48 ------- Thank you for your lots of works. My concern is that the shared memory is not locked exclusively among all the processes, rather than kernel panic. If the shared memory is not locked properly, other processes may overwrite the shared data when someone is updating the shared data. Is this OK? By the way, the kernel panic can also be avoided by using fcntl instead of flock. It's flock bug. This is done by setting HAVE_FLOCK to 0 in portable.h before doing make, though it may not be recommended. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
