https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65256
--- Comment #4 from Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to romain.manni-bucau from comment #3) > Hi, > > I think it is a bug to not list interfaces. > Spec quote considers interfaces as "class" in its wording: > > > extends / implements one those classes > I think you're right. It wasn't my intention to claim that current behavior should be changed. Following the research started in https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65244 I found that specification may be confusing. But while 65244 was good catch, this one rather isn't. Thinking more about it, even `package-info` should be valid among the classes passed to `SCI.onStartup()` (when there's annotation used on a package in `@HandlesTypes`). So please excuse me for the confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
