Le 07/12/2020 à 19:00, ma...@apache.org a écrit :
> commit dcf2044bd4f653154cb60218a3f3667673f746bf
> Author: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
> AuthorDate: Wed Dec 2 14:21:04 2020 +0000
>
> Fix IDE warning
> ---
> java/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/java/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java
> b/java/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java
> index e50bebe..bc2dd83 100644
> --- a/java/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java
> +++ b/java/javax/servlet/http/Cookie.java
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ public class Cookie implements Cloneable, Serializable {
> } else {
> strictServletCompliance = AccessController.doPrivileged(
> (PrivilegedAction<Boolean>) () ->
> Boolean.valueOf(System.getProperty(
> -
> "org.apache.catalina.STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE")));
> +
> "org.apache.catalina.STRICT_SERVLET_COMPLIANCE"))).booleanValue();
> propStrictNaming = AccessController.doPrivileged(
> (PrivilegedAction<String>) () -> System.getProperty(
>
> "org.apache.tomcat.util.http.ServerCookie.STRICT_NAMING"));
My IDE (IntelliJ 2020.3) gives the opposite warning and suggests using
auto-boxing instead of explicit boxing/unboxing. Should I avoid using
auto-boxing in Tomcat?
Emmanuel Bourg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
