https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63943
--- Comment #8 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> --- A little research suggests that this is usually included in the X-Forwarded-For header rather than as a separate header. RFC 7239 uses that format as does Azure. I haven't found any references to a dedicated header. Any reason to to address this by adding support for port as well as address in X-Forwarded-For ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
