https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64634
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> --- Is it supplying X-Forwarded-For or X-Forwarded-Host? X-Forwarded-For should contain the IP address of the client, and having their port number (some random high-numbered port, likely) is pretty useless. Looks like Microsoft just went ahead and made-up their own standard for how these things are done, rather than following established norms[*]. They've also invented some new things: X-Forwarded-Port (??) and X-Original-Host (why not X-Forwarded-Host?). [*] Okay, fine, so Squid invented this stuff and there is no RFC, etc. defining it, but if all other proxies agree on how to do this, why does Azure have to change everything? >:/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
