On 28/02/2020 14:51, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:

> 1). The diff block above - the same attribute is documented twice?

Not sure how I missed that. I'll get the duplicate removed.

> 2). I think that this attribute should be mentioned in security-howto.

I'll add something.

> 3). Why force a <nobr> here? I think this will make documentation less 
> readable.

I was neutral on it so I left it. Happy to remove it.

> 4). The same <nobr> question here.

And the same answer :)

> 5). In one of source files: (copy-pasting a previous fragment from the diff):
> 
> +    /**
> +     * Return whether authentication information shall be persisted or not.
> +     *
> +     * @return {@code true}, if authentication information shall be 
> persisted;
> +     *         {@code false} otherwise
> +     */
> +    private boolean isPersistAuthentication() {
> +        if (manager instanceof ManagerBase) {
> +            return ((ManagerBase) manager).getPersistAuthentication();
> +        }
> +        return false;
> +    }
> 
> 5). Why the getter names are inconsistent?
> 
> Here "isPersistAuthentication()" is implemented as a call to
> "getPersistAuthentication()".

I'll make them consistent (get)

Thanks for the review.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to