https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180

Tom <tpar...@cbnco.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---

--- Comment #2 from Tom <tpar...@cbnco.com> ---
Would this be a change that you would be willing to consider?  

The current behaviour is non-intuitive and makes working with parametrized
server.xml files impossible.  

As soon as secret is in there anywhere (even an invalid one, it accepts "")
then it's mandatory.   

As an admin and package maintainer I feel that the the secretRequired field
should trump any setting in secret based on the current description in the
documentation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to