https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64180
Tom <tpar...@cbnco.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #2 from Tom <tpar...@cbnco.com> --- Would this be a change that you would be willing to consider? The current behaviour is non-intuitive and makes working with parametrized server.xml files impossible. As soon as secret is in there anywhere (even an invalid one, it accepts "") then it's mandatory. As an admin and package maintainer I feel that the the secretRequired field should trump any setting in secret based on the current description in the documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org