https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64063
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> --- Maybe this is a Tomcat packaging issue and less of a libtcnative issue? The confusion comes from the fact that "bin" usually means native-binary and lib usually means .jar files (for Java applications). So where do you put a native binary library? I think reasonable people can disagree about this. tcnative's configure/make/make install should not deviate from native toolchain standards. But Tomcat can package the .so/.dll/.dylib wherever it wants. If we behave differently on Windows-vs-*NIX, then documentation is more complicated, confusing, etc. Tomcat ships with native .dll files for Windows but not .so/.dylib for other OSs. Is this just a request to make sure that each user is comfortable in their own environment? It seems like choosing "bin" means that Windows-partisans "win" and choosing "lib" means that UNIX-partisans "win". Can/should we support either/or? Or do we have to pick one location to rule them all? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org