On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:51 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've been looking at the 9.0.x changes. > > What is clearer now (I think the differences were always there - just > harder to see with the more complex code) is that there are some minor > differences in behaviour when all of the following are true: > - the source buffer is emptied when it is copied to the socket buffer > - the socket buffer is full after the source buffer has been copied > > In some cases there will be an immediate write to the network. In other > cases the network write will wait until the next write to the socket > buffer or the next explicit flush. > > I think I prefer an immediate write in this scenario. WDYT to updating > (very carefully) all of the write methods to behave that way? > Ah personally I did prefer not writing that full buffer (unless the source still has data, of course) on purpose since I considered not doing IO reduced the likelihood to block on IO (or write 0 for non blocking and having to use the poller). That's possible though if you like it better. Rémy
