https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63879
--- Comment #8 from Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> ---
(In reply to Michael Bazos from comment #6)
> I agree switching to TRACE is the best option. Also it might be helpful to
> not throw new Exception()
Note that the exception is not thrown, only constructed. Yes, this requires the
runtime to walk the the stack to produce the stack trace (Which is precisely
why it's being done at all) but we don't incur the penalty of actually throwing
the exception.
> this produces this message
> "java.lang.Exception: null" If you are going to have this it might be best
> to provide a message to let people know this is intended and testing.
+1 to adding a message e.g. new Exception("Intentional stack trace")
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
