https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62964
Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #4 from Christopher Schultz <[email protected]> --- I've looked at the RFC and it's not great. It basically says "you must repeat the HTTP response code in the 'status' field", everything else is optional, and any endpoint can make-up its own URIs for the "error type". So the "status" doesn't add anything, and every other field has no meaning unless the client and server agree on the URIs for the "type". If WebDAV has defined specific "type" URIs then I think this is a plausible feature for implementation. Until then, it's just individual developers making stuff up in the hopes that clients choose that particular implementation. Building against non-standards gets everyone into trouble. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
